Skip to main content

Your website and your software should work together.

See what's breaking

Use case

How to Connect Your Law Firm Website to Clio

By Mike Eads ·

Most law firm websites have a contact form and a general inbox. Clio sits open in another tab. When a prospective client submits the form, someone on your team reads the email, opens Clio, manually creates a contact, starts a matter, and tries to remember to run a conflict check. That gap — between the website and your practice management software — is where qualified matters go cold. Here is how to close it.

Why the intake gap is expensive for law firms

Someone facing an employment dispute, a contract problem, or an urgent legal deadline is not patient. They submit a contact form because they want to know whether your firm can help them — and they want to know quickly. If the answer takes 24 hours because the inquiry sat in a shared inbox overnight and then required manual entry into Clio before anyone could assess it, many prospective clients will have already called another firm.

The cost is not just the lost matter. It is the time your intake coordinator spent on triage and data entry for a lead that went cold before they got to it.

A direct connection between your website and Clio removes the triage step entirely. The record is in Clio the moment the form is submitted.

What a Clio-connected intake form does the moment it is submitted

  1. 1

    Creates a Clio contact and matter automatically

    The prospective client becomes a Clio contact. A matter is created with the practice area, issue type, and intake details pre-populated. Your intake coordinator sees a complete record in Clio — not a raw email.

  2. 2

    Surfaces conflict check data immediately

    The opposing party's name — if collected on the form — is already in the matter record. Your intake coordinator can run the conflict check in Clio before picking up the phone. No separate step, no delay.

  3. 3

    Routes the notification to the right person

    Employment matters go to one coordinator. Family law to another. Estate planning to a third. The routing logic handles this before the notification fires, so the right person sees the right matter without anyone manually sorting a shared inbox.

  4. 4

    Gives your team what they need to assess fit on the first call

    Your coordinator opens Clio and sees the issue type, the client's role, the jurisdiction, and the urgency level — before they say hello. They can ask the right questions immediately instead of spending the first five minutes of a screening call collecting information the form should have already captured.

What your law firm intake form needs to capture

A generic "tell us about your situation" form is not intake. It is a message box that dumps unstructured text into an inbox. For a Clio-connected intake form to do useful work, it needs to collect structured data that maps to Clio fields.

For an employment law firm, that means:

  • Issue type — wrongful termination, discrimination, wage dispute, harassment, retaliation, non-compete, other
  • Client's role — employee / former employee / employer
  • Employer or opposing party name (for conflict check — this field alone changes what's possible before the first call)
  • State where the issue occurred
  • When the issue happened or when action is needed by
  • Current employment status
  • Whether they have spoken to another attorney
  • Preferred contact method and availability

With those fields mapped to Clio on submission, your intake coordinator starts every screening call from a position of knowledge — not discovery. The call is shorter, the assessment is more accurate, and the conflict check is already done.

How the Clio API connection works

Clio has a public API that allows external systems to create contacts, matters, and activities. When your intake form is submitted, the integration sends the form data to Clio's API, which creates the records in real time and triggers your notification workflow.

This is not a Zapier sequence that runs on a 15-minute delay or fails silently when a field is missing. A properly built Clio integration handles field mapping, duplicate detection on email and phone, and error recovery — so the record lands in Clio every time, not most of the time.

Practice area routing is built into the same integration. If someone selects "wage dispute," the matter routes differently than "harassment." Your intake team does not manage a shared inbox to make this work — the logic runs before the notification fires.

What changes when intake is connected

Before a Clio-connected intake form: an inquiry arrives in email, someone reads it, opens Clio, creates a contact, starts a matter, tries to remember the opposing party's name, sends a generic acknowledgment, and the intake coordinator calls back with no information in front of them.

After: an inquiry arrives, Clio has the record immediately, the conflict check is runnable before the first call, the intake coordinator opens Clio and knows the issue, the role, and the urgency before they say hello. The first call is a screening call — not a data-collection call.

The matters you miss because intake was slow don't appear anywhere in your data. You don't know how many prospective clients submitted a form and called another firm before your team got back to them. The only way to know is to close the gap.

Next step

Find out where your website is losing leads

The System Check is free, takes 10 minutes, and gives you a plain estimate of how many leads you're losing and what it's costing.

Frequently asked questions

Can I connect my law firm website directly to Clio?
Yes. When your intake form is built with a Clio integration, every submission creates a new matter or lead in Clio automatically — with all the intake fields pre-populated. No manual entry, no inbox triage, no copy-pasting from email. The connection uses Clio's API and runs in real time.
What intake information should a law firm collect on the website?
At minimum: the legal issue type, the prospective client's role in the matter (plaintiff, defendant, employee, employer), the opposing party's name if known, the jurisdiction, and how urgently they need help. With those fields, your intake coordinator can run a conflict check and assess fit before the first call — saving time on both sides.
Does connecting the website to Clio replace the firm's intake process?
No — it feeds the intake process instead of bypassing it. The website form captures the information needed to start the conflict check and assess fit. Your intake coordinator still makes the call, reviews the matter, and decides whether to proceed. The connection removes the data-entry step and the inbox-triage step so your coordinator spends time on judgment, not transcription.
How does conflict checking work when intake is connected to Clio?
When a website submission creates a Clio contact or matter, the opposing party's name is already in the record. Your intake coordinator can run the conflict check in Clio immediately — before the first call, not after. This shortens the time between inquiry and cleared-to-proceed, and catches conflicts before your team invests time in a matter you can't take.
What is The System Check for law firms?
The System Check is a free 10-minute diagnostic that looks at your website setup, your Clio configuration, and how inquiries move between them. It estimates how many qualified matters you're losing to intake friction — slow response, incomplete information, or inquiries that never reach your team — and gives you a plain-language summary of where the breakdown is.

Start here

Find out where your website is leaking

The System Check is free and takes 10 minutes. You get a plain estimate of how many leads you're losing and where the breakdown is before you spend anything.