What's breaking right now
What's breaking right now on most Clio employment-law sites
Cost of delay
One slow employment-law handoff can cost the consult, the qualified matter, and the follow-up sequence that should have started immediately.
The handoff is not leaking because the homepage is ugly. It is leaking because the website and Clio are not sharing the same first minute. That is broken-handoff repair for businesses on Clio.
Path fit
What a Clio-connected website does instead
The site captures fit, timing, and claim context before the handoff starts, then opens the right matter path in Clio so the first response begins with usable information. The native path works when the standard Clio flow is enough. The custom path exists when the firm needs cleaner plaintiff-side screening before the matter reaches intake.
Native path
The firm copies the iframe or script tag generated in Clio Grow and pastes it onto their website's 'Contact Us' or 'Book a Consultation' page. Submissions go straight to the Clio Grow Lead Inbox.
Controlled path
A custom web form captures the prospective client's information. A server-side script securely connects to the Clio API using an OAuth token and POSTs the data to create a new Contact and Matter so the team is not screening a generic contact form by hand.
When someone asks AI who to hire for employment law, your site should survive the comparison.
Buyers are not just using Google. They are using AI to compare options, verify claims, and build a shortlist before they click through. That means answering the obvious questions clearly, showing proof that fits this buyer, and making the next step easy once they arrive.
What that requires
- Answer the obvious questionsReplace vague brochure copy with direct answers about fit, timing, pricing, and what happens next.
- Back the claims with proofPut the proof where the buyer feels the most doubt: examples, specifics, response expectations, and real outcomes.
- Make the next step easyGive the buyer a clear action and route the inquiry into the right person and the right software.
Before / after
How the Clio handoff changes once the page is fixed
Before
- 1Website form submission lands in a generic inbox.
- 2Someone checks it later and has to reconstruct the request.
- 3The first callback starts without the detail needed to open the right matter.
- 4Response slows down while the buyer is still comparing alternatives.
- 5Clio either sees an incomplete handoff or never sees it at all.
After
- 1Website form submission is categorized immediately.
- 2matter in Clio is created within 90 seconds.
- 3The right person gets a intake alert with the full context attached.
- 4The site triggers the consultation follow-up while intent is still hot.
- 5Nothing falls through because Clio saw the inquiry first.
Leakage estimate
About 4 inquiries a month are at risk here.
That is roughly $18,000 in revenue pressure if the handoff keeps slowing down before Cliosees the inquiry.
Directional estimate based on 22 monthly inquiries and about 18% of them not making it through, with $4,500 per inquiry.
Page proof
Clio + Employment Law should behave like a real intake handoff, not a contact form
Working proof
Operating proofEmployment Law intake written for Clio
Target handoff
matter in Clio within 90 seconds
Operational fit
Employment Law intake logic written for Clio, not generic lead forms
Local illustration for Clio and Employment Law
- Matter created within 90 seconds
- Plaintiff-side fit screening
- No inbox-first consultation handoff
Video explanation
See the Clio handoff logic before you buy the rebuild.
The short video explains what the fixed path changes, what reaches the business software first, and why The System Check comes first.
Who it helps
The owner and any second stakeholder who needs the handoff logic in one pass.
What it covers
Failure path, fixed route, and when to move from The System Check into Preview.
What it does not do
It does not replace Preview or promise a software migration.
Commercial bridge
The System Check comes first. Preview comes after it.
After The System Check
Use Preview once the handoff problem is named.
Start with The System Check so the leak and workflow drag are named before Preview.
Still evaluating
Use The System Check when the problem still needs a name.
If you are not yet sure whether the loss is speed, where the lead goes, or follow-up discipline, use The System Check before you pay for the preview.
Want The System Check first
Start with the public estimate, then come back here.
The System Check gives you a first-pass leakage read. Preview becomes the right move once you want the private fix built around your site.
Related paths