Skip to main content
ServiceTitan for Asphalt paving

Asphalt paving websites for ServiceTitan that sort scope

We keep getting vague paving inquiries with no clue how big or urgent the job is. When patching, maintenance, and resurfacing requests all hit the same handoff, estimate time leaks before a usable ServiceTitan booking or lead exists.
Asphalt Paving operator language
ServiceTitan Booking or Job handoff
Booked-job focus

Problem / Fix

What's broken on most asphalt paving websites

We're getting paving leads, but the site does not tell us enough to know whether this is patching, maintenance, or a real resurfacing opportunity.

What breaks first

What's broken on most asphalt paving websites

We're getting paving leads, but the site does not tell us enough to know whether this is patching, maintenance, or a real resurfacing opportunity. Most paving sites treat every request like the same generic form, so the team cannot qualify property type, geography, or urgency quickly. That slows the estimate path down while property managers and owners keep comparing other vendors in the same window.

Cost of delay

A slow or vague first response can cost the estimate window on a profitable paving job and leave the team spending time on low-fit work instead.

Industry context lives at /for/asphalt-paving.

What the connected website changes

What a ServiceTitan-connected website does instead

The website separates patching, sealcoating, and resurfacing intent before the handoff starts. On the native path, Scheduling Pro can create a job directly or send a booking request back to the office for follow-up. On the custom path, a backend uses ServiceTitan's client-credentials OAuth flow and REST V2 API to create or update the right Customer, Location, Booking, Lead, or Job record with cleaner service-type, urgency, and scope context attached.

Native path

Use Scheduling Pro when the business can stay inside ServiceTitan's native booking flow for standard asphalt paving requests.

API or managed intake

Use the REST V2 API path when property type, scope type, and geography need to be captured before the estimate queue begins.

View platform detail

Connection patterns

How the connection works

These patterns should read like operating choices, not generic feature boxes.
Simplest pathSource

Native ServiceTitan Scheduling Pro

The customer uses Scheduling Pro on the website and ServiceTitan creates either a Job directly or a Booking that appears on the Calls > Bookings screen for the office to work. This is the fastest path when the business mainly needs speed and can stay inside the native scheduler flow.

When to use

Choose this when the business wants standard asphalt paving booking or estimate capture without a custom qualification layer.

More controlSource

Custom asphalt paving intake + ServiceTitan REST API

The website captures scope type, property type, project location, and timeline before the handoff starts. A backend then uses ServiceTitan's client-credentials OAuth flow and REST V2 API to create or update the matching records with cleaner service-type, urgency, and scope context attached.

When to use

Choose this when maintenance and full paving work need different routing before the first callback.

Intake design

What the website captures for asphalt paving

Generic forms miss the property and scope detail a paving estimator needs before responding with confidence.

Field

Scope type

Separates patching, maintenance, and resurfacing before the callback starts.

Field

Property type

Distinguishes commercial lots, multifamily properties, and residential driveways.

Field

Project location

Confirms geography and service-area fit.

Field

Timeline

Shows whether the job belongs in the active quote window or a longer planning path.

Field

Square footage or scope notes

Gives the estimator enough detail to prioritize the opportunity.

Diagnostic preview

We usually find 3 ServiceTitan handoff leaks on paving sites.

  • We keep running into this: patching and resurfacing requests are dumped into the same callback queue.
  • We keep running into this: the form never captures property type or scope well enough for a confident first reply.

Workflow path

Typical asphalt paving + ServiceTitan workflows

The point here is to show readers how a lead moves, not bury them in another generic list block.
within week

Maintenance or repair request

  1. Trigger

    A property owner needs patching, sealcoating, or smaller paving work.

  2. Capture

    The website captures scope type, property type, and timeline before the office calls back.

  3. Platform handoff

    ServiceTitan stores the lead, booking, or job context with enough scope detail for the right follow-up path.

planned

Full resurfacing inquiry

  1. Trigger

    A buyer is evaluating a larger paving or resurfacing project.

  2. Capture

    The intake routes the inquiry with scope and property detail instead of treating it like routine maintenance.

  3. Platform handoff

    ServiceTitan receives a cleaner Booking or Job-ready handoff with enough location context for the office to route or qualify it quickly.

same day

Repeat property manager intake

  1. Trigger

    A past customer or manager comes back for another paving cycle.

  2. Capture

    The website preserves property and scope context for a faster reply.

  3. Platform handoff

    ServiceTitan receives a cleaner Booking, Lead, or Job-ready handoff so the office can prioritize the fast-response path without starting from zero.

Direct value

Why connect the website directly to ServiceTitan

These are the operating gains teams get when the website stops dropping context before ServiceTitan sees the lead.

Faster estimate triage

Scope type and property fit are visible before the first callback.

Cleaner office context

The team sees more than a vague paving question and a phone number.

Better scope separation

Full resurfacing leads do not sit in the same queue as patching and maintenance.

Technical detail

Technical details

Expandable — for ops managers and technical reviewers

How authorization works
ServiceTitan's V2 APIs use OAuth 2.0 client credentials. The integration needs a tenant-specific client ID and client secret plus the app key and tenant ID, then it requests a short-lived access token from ServiceTitan's token endpoint.
How data moves
Native asphalt paving bookings can run through Scheduling Pro. A custom website flow sends structured intake to a backend that calls ServiceTitan's REST V2 API to create or update Customer, Location, Booking, Lead, or Job records with scope and routing context attached.
What this integration cannot do
Public webhook documentation is incomplete for new implementations because current subscriptions are restricted while V2 webhooks are still being developed. The website should not promise a broader integration surface than what is publicly documented.

Review the standards language, documented limits, and explicit constraints before you commit to a rebuild.

Open technical trust page

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

Answer the operational objections directly and keep the interaction light.
Does this replace ServiceTitan?
No. The website feeds ServiceTitan and improves the estimate handoff. ServiceTitan still owns the operating workflow after the lead lands.
Can the site separate maintenance from resurfacing work?
Yes. The intake can qualify property type and scope before the office has to sort the request manually.
Do we need the ServiceTitan API right away?
No. Many asphalt paving teams can start with Scheduling Pro and only add the REST V2 API path when the workflow needs more control.
What if our current form keeps wasting estimate time?
That's the leak we are fixing: we keep getting vague paving inquiries with no clue how big or urgent the job is, and the website should solve that before the lead reaches ServiceTitan.
We already have ServiceTitan. Why change the website?
ServiceTitan already runs the downstream workflow. The website still has to capture the right detail, route it cleanly, and start follow-up before that demand cools off.
We do not want more tools.
We do not add another disconnected tool just to say we added automation. The website and routing layer are built around ServiceTitan so your team keeps one operating system and one source of truth.
We need more leads, not more process.
More leads do not fix a weak handoff. If the site is already dropping context or slowing response, buying more demand just makes ServiceTitan absorb more noise instead of more booked jobs.
What lands in ServiceTitan first?
The goal is a cleaner servicetitan booking or job handoff for asphalt paving demand, not another inbox that forces the team to re-qualify the lead.

Pricing and guarantee

If the route is right, the commercial step stays standard.

The page is route-specific on purpose. The paid reveal, the Instant offer, and the launch guarantee stay public and consistent.

Base offer

Instant

$3,500 setup + $1,250/month

Fast edge-deployed site, instant intake logic, software routing, and ongoing technical ownership after launch.

Paid proof

48-Hour Site Reveal

$100

Complete the Lead Leak Audit intake, pay the reveal fee, review the private preview, then book The Intake Review from the preview page.

$100 is credited toward setup if you sign.

Guarantee doctrine

Launch timing and routing are both covered.

Your site launches within 21 days of completed onboarding. If that date slips, your setup fee is refunded in full.

Your intake and software routing must work correctly at launch. If they do not, I fix them at no charge.

Tailored deliverable

See your asphalt paving site rebuilt around ServiceTitan

We will show where the current paving handoff breaks and what the website should capture before the lead reaches ServiceTitan. If the reveal shows the route fits, Instant is $3,500 setup + $1,250/month. The commercial step stays standard even when the route proof is specific.

If we're still making the estimator figure out whether this is patching or resurfacing on the callback, the website is leaking time we should keep. Launch within 21 days of completed onboarding or the setup fee is refunded in full. Routing issues at launch get fixed at no charge. The 21-day launch guarantee starts only after completed onboarding, never at reveal intake or payment.

Related paths

Keep the research path moving.

Adjacent routes should be obvious next clicks, even if there are only one or two of them.
Browse all ServiceTitan routes →
Same platform, different vertical

HVAC websites for ServiceTitan that stop booking leaks

We keep running into this problem: when it gets hot or cold, the phones explode and the web leads that should be easy money get buried. When emergency and replacement intent hit a weak handoff, revenue bleeds in minutes. This setup sorts HVAC demand, then lands it as a ServiceTitan Booking or Job instead of a dead-end message.
Open page
Same platform, different vertical

Roofing websites for ServiceTitan that stop booking leaks

When weather hits, the site floods us with inspection requests but half of them are missing the details we need to move fast. Storm and inspection demand bleeds fast when the website handoff is thin. This setup captures claim and scope context, then lands the work as a ServiceTitan Booking or Job instead of a dead inbox lead.
Open page
Same vertical, different platform

Asphalt paving websites for Buildertrend that qualify scope fast

Buildertrend teams usually feel the leak on the first callback. We keep getting vague paving inquiries with no clue how big or urgent the job is. When patching, sealcoating, and full resurfacing requests all land in the same inbox, the estimator wastes the first conversation figuring out whether the lead even fits. This setup separates scope type and property fit before the handoff reaches Buildertrend so the estimating team stops triaging blind.
Open page
Same vertical, different platform

Asphalt paving websites for Jobber that sort scope

Jobber teams usually see the leak when dispatch has to rebuild the story from scratch. We keep getting vague paving inquiries with no clue how big or urgent the job is. When patching, maintenance, and resurfacing requests all hit the same handoff, estimate time leaks before a usable Jobber Request exists.
Open page