Websites built around Swept
Operator reality
What Swept already handles well
Proof summary
Strongest next step
Start with the assessment if you need a provider-fit first pass.
Live route inventory
0 active Swept routes across 0 approved waves.
Operator pressure
We struggle with the lack of an open API, as it forces our administrative team to manually double-enter data from our sales CRM into Swept once a contract is won.
Buyer comparison set
CleanTelligent, Janitorial Manager, Aspire (formerly FieldRoutes), Jobber
Website gap
Where the website gap starts before Swept
Swept is almost entirely focused on post-sale operations and workforce management. It does not provide public-facing marketing tools, CRM capabilities, or embeddable website forms for capturing new commercial cleaning leads or generating instant quotes.
- No native CRM for managing top-of-funnel sales leads or prospective clients.
- Lacks native, embeddable 'Request a Quote' forms for public marketing websites.
- Does not provide an open public API for custom website integrations.
Fit guidance
Who usually fits a Swept-centered website rebuild
Best fit
- Teams already running Swept as the system of record
- Operators who need stronger qualification before data reaches Swept
- Businesses that need a public site and intake flow shaped around industrial demand
Caution fits
- Teams expecting undocumented writes or shortcuts inside Swept
- Organizations that have not decided whether Swept is the long-term operating system
Not ideal for
- Buyers who only want a visual redesign with no intake or handoff changes
- Teams that need the website to promise workflows Swept does not publicly document
Traditional agency build
Why this Swept hub cannot read like a generic agency page
- Generic copy treats Swept like a logo instead of an operating constraint.
- The website handoff stays vague, so teams keep repairing missing context manually.
- Each new landing page reopens scope because the integration story was never made explicit.
Peak Leverage operating layer
What a real Swept hub does instead
- Route copy stays aligned with the documented Swept handoff.
- Public-site language matches the operator pressure the team feels inside Swept.
- Technical trust, route selection, and next actions stay on one parent hub.
Route explorer
Choose the industry route that matches how Swept is used
Route inventory
Routes coming next
The parent hub is live, and the industry-specific routes for Swept are still moving through approval. Start with the assessment so the next route reflects your actual operating pressure.
Documentation status
How documented the Swept integration surface really is
Embed surface
No public native embed surface is documented for Swept.
API surface
No public API surface is documented for Swept.
Webhook surface
No public webhook surface is documented for Swept.
Rate limits
No public rate-limit policy is documented for Swept.
Versioning
No public versioning policy is documented for Swept.
Sandbox
No public sandbox or test environment is documented for Swept.
Technical trust path
Data does not flow between the public marketing website and Swept. Swept acts as a closed, post-sale operational silo. Any data transfer from a CRM or website must be done manually by the operations team.
Swept does not expose an open developer API, so there is no standard OAuth or API key authentication available for third-party web integrations.
Need the standards language?
Review auth, API model, rate limits, versioning, security notes, and explicit constraints before you commit Swept to a live website handoff.
Next step
See whether Swept is the right handoff layer for your website
We will show the public-facing flow, the intake logic, and the documented Swept handoff before recommending a rebuild.
The first pass shows where the website is dropping context before Swept can do its job.